Hold Congressional Oversight Hearings on the Failure of Family and Divorce Courts
by Stop Abuse Campaign · 2,161 supporters
Family courts exist as an incestuous, unquestioned, multi-million dollar money making venue for attorneys, custody evaluators, parent coordinators, guardians ad litem, and other inner circle court appointed “players”. Really? So, exactly how does this work? What is the formula that keeps the pay-out wheels turning here? 1. THE BATTERER/ABUSER/DV PERP, a sociopath in an Armani suit, who will gladly pay any amount to attorneys, psychologists, et al. in order to destroy his ex wife and punish his children for the crimes of leaving him and/or disclosing his violent actions. He brings to his attorney the highly sought after, enormously profitable “high conflict” domestic case. 2. MATRIMONIAL/DOMESTIC/FAMILY ATTORNEYS and OTHER VARIOUS AND SUNDRY “FAVORED” COURT APPOINTEES (parent coordinators, custody evaluators, guardians ad litem, minor’s counsel, therapists, physicians) willing to commit not only professional ethics violations, but punishable crimes such as Accessory to Kidnapping / Assault / Perjury / Fraud Upon the Court / Covering up Child Abuse / Homicide. For carrying out the abuser’s agenda in family court, they make unimaginable amounts of money off of the suffering of helpless children. 3. FAMILY COURT JUDGES; jaded, cold, spiteful, misogynist, and often corrupt, they punish mothers and children for alleging abuse, and are more concerned with keeping their political connections and clearing their docket than protecting children. 4. STATE LEGISLATURES, who have given family court judges “wide discretion” in their rulings with unlawful doctrines like “best interest of the child”, which virtually robs litigants of the constitutional right to appeal family court decisions. 5. STATE APPELLATE COURTS, who admittedly, are reluctant to question family court rulings due to the inherent difficulty of overturning them (or because of laziness, cronyism, and political pressure).
But what, you ask, is the crucial component of this RICO-esque charade? The raw fodder without which none of the above described Machiavellian theatrics could occur? The answer is ABUSED CHILDREN AND THE MOTHERS WHO TRY TO PROTECT THEM IN FAMILY COURT. As lambs to the slaughter, they are exploited and picked clean to the point of financial, spiritual, and emotional decimation. Once the fodder is depleted, the attorneys et al quickly make their exit (i.e. withdraw from the case) and are on to the next “promising” custody case, the “higher conflict”, the better.
Co-Founder, Vice Chair
Battered Women, Abused Children, and Child Custody: A National Crisis
The Battered Mothers Custody Conference
Liliane Miller, Charlotte, NC3 years ago
Beppie Mulder What Lee did has been in the best interest of her daughter. Todd didn’t want a child back then, Sam was only a tool for him to use against Lee. Especially how he behaved during and after them meeting showed there is something very wrong with him and he wouldn’t have been able to raise a child and won’t be able to emotionally connect with Sam. Nor with anyone else.
Rick Johnson Its clear this father had no interest in the baby, he wanted to get even…now he has a chance to build a relationship with his daughter but chooses to brag about his material things.. pretty mess up.. Daughter and Son turned out very good..credit to the mother.
THERE IS A MAJOR PROBLEM in this country when it comes to family court systems and SOMETHING NEEDS TO CHANGE.